| ||||||||||||||
CHRISTIAN PILGRIMAGE |
PRIMUM MOBILE |
CHRISTIAN PILGRIMAGE |
PAUL LYTLE |

![]() Subscribe to the podcast. HomeBibliography
MusicBooksNovelsShort storiesPoetryEssaysPodcasts and sermonsPhotographs
Statement of faithScripture indexContact me
This site copyright © 2004-2009 by Paul Lytle. All rights reserved. |
The Width and Depth of PowerA Look at Romans 8:28This is the first essay I wrote about my favorite verse in the Bible: Romans 8:28. I'm not completely happy with it, but this is one of those verses I'm going to go back to over and over again in my life, so you'll probably see much more on this one in the future. |
|
God causes: Well, if we are going to make a statement like this, then it has to be God in command, since He is the only one who could pull it off. God is foremost in control here, and it is He who does the action. all things: We are referring to everything, not most things or some things. Everything. Every event, every meeting, every word. All of it. Again John McArthur puts it into perspective for us: "All things is utterly comprehensive, having no qualifications or limits" (472). There is nothing that escapes this promise. work together: And these events are not individually good, but all tied together toward that end. This is that path I referred to earlier. Each event adds to the last and leads to the next. We must be very careful here, because we are not saying that all events are good, but that they work together for the good. We still have terrible tragedies and sin, but even these events will be used by God to further His plan. Matthew Henry, in his wonderful Commantary on the Whole Bible, notes that "we see believers compassed about with manifold afflictions; though the Spirit makes intercession for them, yet their troubles are continued . . . but in this the Spirit's intercession is always effectual, that, however it goes with them, all this is working together for their good." for good: To be sure, I looked up "good" in the original Greek. The word used here is "agathos," which means, literally, "good." Well, I'm glad we got that cleared up. This means exactly what we think it means. Everything is working within God's plan and leading toward a restoration of His perfect design. to those who love God: This is a promise, a covenant for those who believe. Love the Lord and all things will work together for good for you. to those who are called according to His purpose: The other side of "those who love God." We are referring to the same people here, but in a slightly different context. You see, this promise goes beyond the previous one. While I have not "loved God" all my life, I have always been called. Again the action moves to God's side of the table. He is putting things in place long before we are ready to experience them. we know: Back at the beginning of the verse, Paul is saying that we already know this is true. He is not making a bold promise, as we thought before, but stating a fact! |
Yes, we already know, do we not? We all feel like Truman sometimes. We can all see that path running through the middle of our lives if we look. We have all felt that extreme sense of coincidence and known that something extraordinary was working from the outside to make things right.
But here is the problem: How can we all be like Truman? I mean that Truman Burbank was the star of the show and everyone was there for him. That's easy! But how can my actions be working for the good for other Christians when the actions of those other Christians (and everyone else around me) be working for my good? How can we all be the stars of a very personalized show?
Imagine, if you will, a novelist. A skilled novelist can, by careful plotting and patience, create a story in which all of his characters and events, in the end, advance the good. I have been reading several of Shakespeare's comedies lately, and sometimes this happens. Oh, there is often one villain who gets the short end of the stick, but everyone else ends up married or wealthy or something beneficial. Besides that one villain, things generally work out for everyone involved. That's the sort of story I am thinking of.
Of course, the more characters and more events he places into the novel, the more complicated this task would be. At a hundred characters, it would be nearly impossible to have everything work toward the good and still maintain and good plot. Even Shakespeare limited it to about five to ten. The novelist can, of course, cheat his way out of the problem by having everyone win the lottery, but let us assume that he is trying to create a quality novel here. Imagine then, a thousand characters, and a million, and then a billion. We can get a glimpse of the complexity of this one verse when we think of it in those terms. God's power must be clear to us when we see the scope of this promise.
Now we are beginning to glimpse the scope and size of the power of God. Such an infinitely complicated equation is, by human standards, impossible, and yet God can do it. He can arrange everything so that each action is personal to every believer around, and each act, even the worst atrocity, works to the good.
And it gets even more complicated! Hyper-Calvinists will often point to verses like this, or when God hardens Pharaoh's heart, as proof of their vision of God, which is a vision that does not allow even the smallest of opinions from anyone but God. In this belief, we are basically puppets to God's will and cannot even express a desire of our own. Well, since the following verses deal with predestination directly (even using the word), it is not a subject that we can avoid. Paul speaks of predestination and those who are "chosen" enough that we cannot brush it under the rug. It exists. God does chose, and he does predestine (see Ephesians 1:4, for example).
But what of the verses that deal with choices? Why does Jesus scold the Disciples for their lack of faith if they have nothing to do with that faith? The message of Christ seems misdirected if we accept the totalitarianism of Hyper-Calvinism.
But this very discussion suggests how both views may be correct. Here we have God making all things work for the good for believers, and even though each event has its own causes and effects, it has the greater cause of God's action, and the greater effect of working toward the good in tandem with other events. Say we have a rain storm. Well, we can have a lengthy discussion of the science that causes the rainstorm, and we can also see the effect it has on the grass and such. But at the same time, the event has a spiritual cause, which is God, and a spiritual result, which could be anything that works for the good. Perhaps the rain will quench the thirst of a people, or help them grow food. Or perhaps the rain keeps a person from going out when he would have been in a wreck before. There are millions of possibilities for the rain, and the natural event can have a miraculous result.
Both the science and the spiritual are true in this case, and God's power is not weakened when we say that a high pressure front caused the rain. No, God is still in control, and God brought that rain to that place and in that time, but He can orchestrate the natural to His will.
Can we not say the same of Predestination and Free Will? Can an action not be my own while still being God's? It is not doubting His power to say so, but rather realizing the fuller greatness of His power. He is able to allow us to follow our own path while building that path Himself at the same time.
Is there an analogy from our lives we can use to explain this? Not fully, but perhaps a small one will help. There have been several times when I just really want, say, Mexican food for dinner. I have craved it all day, but out of politeness and love, I ask my wife where she would like to go. To my utter delight, she will sometimes say that she is simply dying for Mexican food!
When I drive my wife to such a restaurant, I am making the path, since I am the one who is driving. But that is not to say that she has not chosen the path as much as I have. Sometimes we have chosen the path separately, as in the example above, not knowing that the other person chose it also. Likewise, God has made our paths, and in His way forced us upon it, but we have chosen it also and will walk every step by our own free will.
My example hardly reveals the full relationship here. The magnitude of such a structure is difficult for us to comprehend. In our limited power we have seen how one man's will often runs into another's, but even when two people's wills coincide, it is merely agreement, not both people acting upon a single will. Let us return to our novelist. He has constructed a plot in which all events and characters work toward the good, but what if those characters had a say in things also? Could he keep control over the plot when his goals and the goals of his subcreation must work in tandem? Well, authors do this sort of thing all the time; we often hear an author speak of how his characters make their own decisions, and it is true in good writers. But in this we have added an extra complication. Now the novelist must limit his characters more so that he can more easily control them.
The great puzzle is so great that we cannot solve it. And yet to put our own failings upon God will help us none. To say that God must control every action we make simply because we cannot control an environment that is open to other input doubts the absolute power of God. Likewise, to say that God has little or no influence on this world because of Free Will comes up short. No, God can do all things, and all at once. He can give us absolute freedom of choice while controlling that choice, and also structuring events and choices to work toward the good.
Maybe a return to our friend Truman Burbank will help us. Truman simply went about his life, little suspecting that he was being manipulated by a television producer who was running the show of Truman's life. In the movie, there are many times when Truman's path is forced upon him, even if Truman does not know. In a much larger sense, God is doing the same with us. Like Truman, we walk upon a prearranged path, and yet we have chosen to walk it.

McArthur, Jr., John. The McArthur New Testament Commentary: Romans 1-8. Chicago: Moody Bible Institute, 1991.
Henry, Matthew. Matthew Henry's Commentary on the Whole Bible. 1706.